In this chapter, the results of white compliance with and non-compliance with multiculturalism will be examined.
Basically, white compliance with the expectations placed upon whites within the milieu of multiculturalism constitute measures taken by whites to +SA at the behest of RE. non-whites and Jews.
White non-compliance with the expectations placed upon them within the milieu of multiculturalism generally constitutes -N/Jrp.
/ Certain Parts of the Race Relations Beliefs Are Changeable
Before discussing the results of white compliance with the maxims, strictures, and demands of current race relations, a point needs to be made. This is that while the basic views of the race relations beliefs remain constant and unchanged, it should be noted that many of the concepts, expectations, and demands making up this body of ideas are always changing to fit the requirements of the moment. So, while the race relations doctrine is spoken of in this work as though it were something static and fixed, it is actually always changing in certain ways.
Since the actions taken in order to +SA are ineffective, negative responses on the part of RE. non-whites and Jews in regard to whites continue. So, certain changes are made in the race relations views mainly through psychological actions in order to explain this. Also, certain changes are occasionally made in the views through psychological measures in order to rectify this.
The changes in the race relations views focused on here will involve XX, which is, as mentioned earlier, an increase in the number of white behaviors that are deemed unacceptable - that is, are indicative that whites feel superior to, harbor animosity toward, and want to harm others - and/or an increase in the degree of unacceptability of any single behavior that had previously been deemed unacceptable.
/ The Effects of White Compliance Upon Non-Whites/Jews and Whites
// General Effects
/// Non-Whites and Jews
As the number of white behaviors deemed unacceptable increases - by virtue of these being interpreted, primarily through psychological actions, as signifying that whites feel superior to, feel hostile toward, want to harm, etc. non-whites and Jews - then the number of white behaviors that cause negative reactions on the part of non-whites and Jews increases. So, a certain white behavior that might not have caused a negative response previously, now does so.
Whites comply with demands to refrain from exhibiting a certain behavior that has been judged unacceptable. This compliance reinforces the idea that the behavior is unacceptable. Also, the longer that the behavior is not evinced, or the more rarely that the behavior is evinced, then the more will interpretation determine the response to this behavior, and the less will a more natural perception of the behavior determine the response to it.
So, for example, say that a behavior that is +W and considered acceptable is declared, through psychological actions, to be behavior that is -N/J and, so, unacceptable. Whites, being compliant, will then refrain from exhibiting this behavior. Since the behavior is no longer seen, or is more rarely seen, and there is less and less experience with it, then the interpretations of this behavior will be assumed to be true. This being the case, when the behavior is expressed it will be responded to as the -N/J it is claimed to be. This response will involve -SA. On the other hand, were whites not to comply with the demand that they cease evincing this behavior, so that it continued to be commonly exhibited - and, so, commonly experienced - then the behavior would continue to be seen as the +W that it is rather than the -N/J that it is claimed to be, or as behavior that is closer to the +W that it is rather than to the -N/J that it is claimed to be, with the result being less pronounced -SA or no -SA.
/// Whites
Belief in the interpretations that drive XX is signaled by, and the degree of legitimacy assigned these interpretations by whites is reinforced by, white compliance.
// Fear
/// Non-Whites and Jews
As XX continues and as white compliance reinforces the perception that the views resulting from XX constitute reality, then the number of white behaviors seen as indicative that whites dislike, want to harm, and feel superior to non-whites and Jews increases. Also, the extent of white animosity and feelings of superiority seen in a white behavior previously deemed negative increases. As a part of this, the number of white behaviors that can -SA increases and the degree to which a given white behavior can -SA increases. All these things increase anxiety involving whites because there is a sense on the part of non-whites and Jews that there is a greater possibility that whites might do something to hurt and harm them, including causing -SA. This increased fear concerning whites would likely increase hostility toward whites.
A part of the negative results of this increase in fear of whites that goes along with XX and white compliance is that this can lower S/ because the anxiety, including an apprehension that whites will do something to cause -SA, can be perceived as weakness, vulnerability, and incapacity relative to whites. As S/ declines, hostility toward whites increases.
/// Whites
Given general white compliance, especially in combination with XX, whites may always be, and increasingly be, afraid of doing something that could lead to their being denounced for not meeting the expectations and the demands placed upon them. They may always be, and increasingly be, afraid of being subject to the negative results of such a denouncement.
// Increase in General Negative Views of and Responses to Whites
/// Non-Whites and Jews
As XX continues and as white compliance reinforces the perception that the views resulting from XX constitute reality, then the negative views of, negative responses to, and hostility toward whites on the part of non-whites and Jews in general become more pronounced.
Notice that because of this, the number of non-whites and Jews who could be classified as RE. non-whites and Jews and the degree to which individuals were RE. non-whites and Jews might increase.
/// Whites
Due to accepting and believing the interpretations that drive XX - with this belief reinforced by compliance - whites, themselves, develop increasingly negative views of the white race.
// Faulty Views and Expectations
/// Non-Whites and Jews
While the views concerning whites in general become more negative, as was delineated above, white compliance, and particularly white compliance in combination with XX, can give rise to a false view of and to false expectations of whites. So, as whites continue to comply with the demands placed upon them, the view will be reinforced, in regard to these whites, that their compliant behavior truly reflects their actual attitudes and mindsets.
Given XX and compliance, the view will grow that many whites do not care about their race or are even anti-white.
Also, white compliance, and, again, particularly in combination with XX, gives rise to the idea that whites are being changed and reformed, and that this process is continuing, so that, eventually, whites will no longer cause negative responses.
/// Whites
Whites accept the interpretations and definitions that drive XX and that make up the operative version of the race relations story. They are likely to feel that if they comply with the expectations placed upon them that they will see themselves as being, and will be seen by others as being, moral, intelligent, up-to-date, and superior, and will gain certain rewards such as social approval and acceptance; and that they will not see themselves as being, and will not be seen by others as being, immoral, unintelligent, behind-the-times, inferior, bigoted, etc., and will not be privy to punishments, ranging from social disapproval to physical violence.
As XX and compliance continue, white views concerning which white attitudes and behaviors are acceptable and which are not become less and less natural and less and less reflective of actual white attitudes and feelings. For example, any degree of +W becomes less and less acceptable, and -W becomes increasingly expected. In fact, milder degrees of -W become less acceptable, and more intensified degrees of -W become expected.
// White Compliance Reduces Justification for Negative Feelings in Regard to Whites and Increases Distrust of Whites (Non-Whites and Jews)
Note. Functional ability and emotional traits will be considered separately here. End Note.
As previously mentioned, the race relations beliefs give non-whites and Jews a justification for venting hostility upon whites and act to alleviate guilt that might result from venting this hostility. However, white compliance with the expectations of the race relations beliefs reduces this justification, so that there may be greater guilt, or a greater sense of wrongdoing, if hostility is shown whites. So, the justification that the race relations beliefs give non-whites and Jews to vent hostility upon whites is reduced or is over-ridden by the lack of justification for venting hostility upon whites when whites are compliant.
Note that as white compliance increases, the legitimacy of the definition of whites as antagonistic, mean, arrogant, etc. decreases and a perception of whites as well-meaning, concerned, etc. increases. As a perception of whites as being well-meaning, concerned, etc. increases, justification for venting hostility upon whites decreases. Hostility toward whites resulting from IRW, etc. would remain because IRW, etc. remain present.
As justification for venting hostility upon whites, or even for feeling hostility toward whites, decreases and as hostility toward whites remains, guilt may increase. Also, IRW may increase in regard to emotional traits, specifically in regard to morality and goodness. (E/ would be lowered.)
Increased IRW (from lowered E/) and guilt may exacerbate some of the other negative feelings in relation to whites. For example, these could well contribute to an increase in anxiety concerning whites. Fears may result in regard to emotional health and social acceptability - including intelligence, ability to be socially appropriate, knowledgeableness, social wherewithal, etc. Too, this anxiety may translate into a fear of whites, which could cause a decline in S/.
In addition, whites doing what were expected - their being nice, etc. - in combination with the above named factors, may result in an increasing sense on the part of RE. non-whites and Jews of being stifled and inhibited about being open and honest with whites. This may cause a sense of being intimidated by and controlled by whites, and this may lead to a decline in S/.
Since IRW, etc. continue regardless of white compliance, there may be a suspicion that whites are doing something to cause the negative feelings despite their 'front' of being accommodating. This could result in whites being seen as disingenuous, underhanded, and hypocritical. Distrust of, suspiciousness concerning, and paranoia in regard to whites could result.
Lowered E/, lowered S/, and increases in various negative feelings such as anxiety, guilt, suspicion, etc., all resulting from a reduction in the justification for negative responses to whites due to white compliance, act to exacerbate hostility toward whites.
As the points presented in this section suggest, the more conscientious whites are in complying with the demands placed upon them, the more IRW, etc., including the more hostility toward them, this may generate.
// Maintaining Justification for Hostility Toward Whites Given White Compliance (Non-Whites and Jews)
In an effort to retain or to re-establish the definition of whites as being immoral, mean, supercilious, etc. in a situation characterized by white compliance - this compliance suggesting that whites are not this way - and, so, to retain or to re-establish the justification to feel hostile toward and to vent hostility upon whites - that is, to minimize the negative results, noted in the previous section, of feeling or of venting this hostility and to maximize the positive results of venting this hostility - the following are done:
\ As actual white wrongs against non-whites and Jews decrease, attention to and emphasis upon anecdotal white wrongs (real, part-real, or imagined) is increased.
\ Also, as actual white wrongs against non-whites and Jews decrease, the attention that is focused upon those actual white wrongs that do occur is increased. Also, the severity of these may be exaggerated.
The mass media is utilized in these efforts.
Too, in order vent hostility upon whites - while avoiding seeing themselves in a negative way and while avoiding being seen by others in a negative way in a situation characterized by increasing white compliance - hostile psychological measures taken by way of the media are increased and hostile physical actions that are more personal may be decreased. In addition, psychological actions and physical actions that are seemingly benign but which can lead to detrimental effects upon whites and white societies are increased.
// Effort
/// Non-Whites and Jews
Continuing effort is required to bring about compliance. This effort involves persuasion, manipulation, and coercion. Given XX, the demands and expectations placed upon whites become more complicated and less and less natural. So, more and more effort is required to induce whites to comply and to maintain compliance.
/// Whites
Whites must put forth effort to comply with the demands placed upon them. Given XX, making compliance less and less natural, increasing effort is required to comply with expectations and to maintain compliance.
// Effects Upon Pride, Self-Concept, and Sense of Adequacy (Whites)
Compliant whites likely see themselves as being, and believe that they are seen by others as being, moral, intelligent, up-to-date, superior to non-compliant whites, and among the sensible. They might receive social approval and be praised, and they avoid the negative results of non-compliance. In this vein, they avoid believing that others view them as being, and perhaps avoid viewing themselves as being, immoral, unintelligent, unsophisticated, inferior, and among the socially unacceptable. Too, they avoid punishments for non-compliance - punishments ranging from social disapproval to loss of job or social position to physical violence.
Many compliant whites may know - though perhaps unconsciously - that they are being intimidated into behaving in the expected manner. This would result in feelings of lowered self-esteem and guilt. For those who realize that their compliance is contributing to the undermining of white identities, cultures, societies, and the white race, this realization can result in guilt, feelings of inadequacy, and lowered self-esteem. The negative results of compliance give rise to hostility toward non-whites, Jews, and liberals.
As XX and compliance continue, a conflict for whites arises. This involves whites trying to avoid the punishments of non-compliance and to gain the rewards of compliance, on the one hand, and by being increasingly demeaned by compliance, on the other. This conflict causes ill-will toward - and, as it continues and intensifies, increasing ill-will toward - non-whites and Jews.
// Reciprocity of Effect (Non-Whites and Jews)
Even given white compliance with the demands made upon whites, there may be a perception that whites are not as negatively affected in personal feelings of adequacy and self-esteem by this largely forced compliance as are non-whites and Jews negatively affected in personal feelings of adequacy and self-esteem, within these very same circumstances, by whites. This reinforces the more general sense that whites are not as subject to being negatively affected in personal sense of adequacy by non-whites and Jews as are non-whites and Jews subject to being negatively affected in this respect by whites. At any rate, this can result in a sense of incapacity relative to whites, which, in turn, can exacerbate IRW, etc. Again, this would include increased hostility toward whites.
// Hostility
/// Non-Whites and Jews
Increasing white compliance, particularly along with increasing XX, leads to increased hostility toward whites following from the ineffectiveness of all the efforts that are made to +SA.
/// Whites
Whites are the target of the increasing hostility that follows from white compliance in conjunction with XX. This, as well as the increased fear and anxiety resulting from the increasing difficulty of complying and the negative effects compliance can have upon feelings of adequacy, all increase hostility felt by whites toward non-whites and Jews.
Also, as mentioned earlier, many whites, accepting the race relations beliefs as legitimate, are apt, themselves, to expect white compliance with these beliefs and to feel hostile toward whites who do not comply with these beliefs.
// When Compliance Slips (Non-Whites and Jews)
Given XX, the number of white behaviors defined as being -N/J increases. So, for instance, the number of behaviors declared to show that whites hate, want to harm, and/or feel superior to non-whites and Jews might go from 10 behaviors, to 100, to 200, etc. In a natural situation, most of these would not be seen as -N/J.
The degree of -N/Jrp of many of these behaviors increases. So, for instance, the degree to which one of these behaviors is said to show that whites hate, want to harm, and/or feel superior to non-whites and Jews may go from a degree of 5, to 50, to 100, etc. In a natural situation, the degree of negativity attributed to most of these behaviors would be 0. The values of almost all the remaining behaviors would be less than 10.
Whites want to see themselves as being, and to be seen by others as being, acceptable and not unacceptable in order to gain the rewards, intrinsic and extrinsic, that result from being acceptable and to avoid the punishments, intrinsic and extrinsic, that result from being unacceptable. Consequently, whites comply with the expectations of the race relations beliefs. They evince behaviors that are defined by these beliefs as being acceptable and do not evince behaviors that are defined by these beliefs as being unacceptable.
In a situation of continuing XX and compliance white behavior moves further and further away from behavior that is natural, free, and genuine. As time goes on, non-whites and Jews believe that white behavior that is less and less genuine is white behavior that is natural, normal, and reflective of true white attitudes. Non-whites and Jews expect whites to behave in the decreasingly natural ways in which whites are expected to behave. The negative reactions, or potential negative reactions, of non-whites and Jews to any white non-compliance increase.
When XX has gone to the point at which compliance is no longer completely possible, whites will begin to exhibit non-compliance. The resulting negative response to this, especially in the initial stages of this non-compliance, will likely be more severe than any that might have resulted had whites never complied.
So, when the demands made upon how whites should behave (and what attitudes and opinions they should hold) become so constricted that whites cannot fully comply, whites will exhibit non-compliance. This non-compliance will involve evincing behaviors that are disallowed whites by the rules of multiculturalism. That is, whites will exhibit behaviors that are defined as being -N/J - and likely, -N/J of a pronounced degree - and which, in a natural situation, would have been behaviors that were seen as being a much lesser degree of -N/J, or which would have been seen as being neutral.
When whites are no longer able to comply and are non-compliant, non-whites and Jews will view the resultant white behavior as being -N/J, and a decided degree of -N/J. This, in turn, will lead to -SA, and a marked degree of -SA.
Also, as non-whites and Jews become increasingly accustomed to whites complying with the expectations placed upon whites and as non-whites and Jews more firmly believe that compliant white behavior is natural, normal, genuine, and reflective of white attitudes, then the more negatively will they respond to white non-compliance in ways additional to the more marked -SA.
This is because not only would whites, in their failure to comply, be seen as exhibiting a pronounced degree of -N/J (which would be, remember, behavior that might not be seen as -N/J at all in a natural situation), but also because non-whites and Jews, being accustomed to white compliance, would feel 'lied' to and 'betrayed' by whites.
Because of the increased degree of -N/J that non-compliant white behavior is defined as having due to XX - with this XX, in turn, being made possible by white compliance - and the shock, disillusionment, and sense of betrayal brought about by white non-compliance, feelings made much more pronounced by white compliance beforehand, then for non-whites and Jews (and even many whites), the potential and pending (and in time, actual) negative response in regard to whites becomes much worse through white compliance than would have been the case without white compliance.
// The Focus of Efforts to Moderate IRW, Etc.
Given continued white compliance, the focus on efforts to moderate negative feelings concerning whites will remain upon the actions taken to date which are, and which will continue to be, ineffective, and indeed, counterproductive. Too, activities that are detrimental to white societies and to the white race will be continued.
// Comment
For non-whites and Jews, white compliance makes it possible for RE. non-whites and Jews to maintain denial of the underlying factors of race relations and to +SA temporarily. However, white compliance also contributes to increases in feelings of inadequacy in regard to functional ability, possibly guilt and feelings of inadequacy and/or anxiety with respect to emotional traits, greater fear and anxiety in regard to whites, and exacerbated hostility toward whites.
For whites, white compliance contributes to feelings of inadequacy (in regard to emotional traits and functional ability, specifically with respect to strength, courage, etc.), greater fear and anxiety in regard to non-whites and Jews, and increased hostility toward non-whites and Jews.
Also, for non-whites, Jews, and whites, compliance and all that is involved in compliance, especially in combination with XX, requires considerable effort.
/ The Effects of White Non-Compliance Upon Non-Whites/Jews and Whites
The results of whites not complying with the demands of cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism, and the race relations beliefs would basically be the reverse of whites complying with these. These results will be touched upon in this section.
// From the Standpoint of RE. Non-Whites and Jews
Given white non-compliance, whites would commonly +W and would sometimes -N/J. So, denial of the underlying elements of race relations on the part of RE. non-whites and Jews would be more difficult. It would be common for -SA to be brought about. Hope of changing VWFP would be lessened or, perhaps, eliminated. Hope of surmounting IRW, etc. would be lessened or, perhaps, eliminated. Hostility toward whites would be aroused.
However, knowing that measures such as those presently taken to +SA would not compel whites to comply with multiculturalism, there would be less impetus to take such measures. Therefore, fewer actions would be taken to +SA. Circumstances characterized by white non-compliance would act to spare RE. non-whites and Jews the effort required to take these actions, the false hope that +SA could truly and permanently be achieved through those actions taken to +SA, and the increased IRW, etc. that failure of these actions causes, including increased hostility toward whites.
Without white compliance, XX could not occur. XX would be precluded by non-compliance. Consequently, the number of white behaviors that would lead to -SA would be fewer, and the degree to which a certain white behavior could cause -SA would be less. Since negative reactions to whites would not be exacerbated by XX, hostility toward whites would be moderated.
So, for example, white -N/J of a certain degree would be seen as -N/J of that degree and not as -N/J of a far greater degree. Or white +W of a given degree would be seen as +W of that degree and not as +W of a far greater degree or as -N/J. Or a neutral behavior would be seen as neutral behavior, not as -N/J.
Anxiety in regard to whites would likely be less because there would be fewer white behaviors defined as -N/J, there would be less -N/J attributed to white behaviors that had been defined previously as being -N/J, and responses to whites would be more stable and predictable.
Given non-compliance, those who felt hostile toward whites may feel freer to express this and feel less stifled in regard to whites. In view of this, these individuals might feel less guilt for holding or expressing hostility toward whites and, so, less concern about their morality and emotional health because of feeling this hostility toward whites. This, itself, might moderate hostility toward whites.
Whites would be seen more realistically. This would preclude disappointment concerning whites as would occur, and the offense and hostility that would occur if, after a period of white compliance, and especially compliance in combination with XX, it became known that the white behavior that had been evinced in such circumstances were disingenuous. Since it would be known that white behavior were a more accurate indication of how whites actually felt, then distrust of, suspiciousness in relation to, and paranoia concerning whites would be less. Hostility stemming from this distrust, suspiciousness, and paranoia would be less.
/// Comment
Negative responses to whites on the part of RE. non-whites and Jews would occur given non-compliance. However, these negative responses probably would not be nearly as prevalent as in the case of compliance - especially compliance in combination with XX.
// From the Standpoint of Whites
Whites, particularly in the initial stages of non-compliance, could be subject to the punishments that non-compliance brings. However, given white non-compliance, whites would behave in a more natural manner. That is, their behavior would more closely reflect their actual views and attitudes. Fear of being denounced would not be a major factor. Feelings of inadequacy stemming from being intimidated into compliance would be precluded.
The realization that white non-compliance were beneficial to white identities, cultures, societies, and the white race, which would be an accurate realization, could well result in feelings of adequacy and heightened self-esteem. Too, the realization that non-compliance would be, in the long-term, more beneficial to all human society than would be compliance, which would also be an accurate realization, would be a positive aspect of non-compliance. Also, whites would be spared the considerable effort required by compliance, especially in combination with XX.
Were whites non-compliant, they would probably be subject to less overall hostility from non-whites and Jews, and they would be less hostile toward non-whites and Jews.
// A Change in Focus to More Effective Efforts to Moderate IRW and Other Negative Responses to Whites
Given white non-compliance, measures that would more effectively moderate negative feelings toward whites could be more widely considered. Also, white non-compliance would act to curtail activities that were detrimental to white societies and to the white race.
// A Cessation of White Compliance
An incidental point should be made here. This is that an advantage of the present situation is that whites have complied with the demands placed upon them for several decades, and assiduously so, but to no avail. This should preclude, given an end of white compliance now, the false hope that would likely have been a factor had whites never complied - such a false hope being that if whites were to comply, then this compliance would act to genuinely +SA.
In the present circumstances, an end to white compliance would be accompanied by the knowledge that, even if whites were to resume compliance, this compliance would be ineffective as to its purpose.
/ The Effects of White Compliance and White Non-Compliance on White Societies and on Non-White Societies
In this section, the effects of white compliance and non-compliance with the demands of multiracialism upon white societies and upon non-white societies will be briefly examined.
// The Effects of White Compliance on White Societies
White compliance leads to the undermining of white identities, cultures, and societies. This compliance encourages and allows large numbers of non-whites to immigrate to white societies. For any white society subject to this immigration, this leads to a decline in the degree of identity that those in the society have with other individuals in that society. This results in a decline in the fondness that the individuals in the society have for one another. This, in turn, leads to a decline in the happiness of individuals in the society.
An increasing proportion of non-whites in the society causes a decline in the degree of identity that those in the society have for the society as a whole. This leads to a decline in the fondness that the individuals in the society have for the society as a whole. This, in turn, results in a decline in the happiness of those in the society.
All the above factors result in a loss of social unity. This leads to the society being undermined and fragmented.
As the society becomes increasingly non-white, the positive outcomes of whites' unique combination of emotional make-up and cognitive abilities - these outcomes including innovations, inventions, philosophies, creations, organizational ideas, etc. - become fewer; and if this process continues, these contributions might eventually cease altogether. Also, the positive influence that the society can have worldwide declines and might eventually cease altogether. And, the degree of positive influence that the society can have on the future of the world declines.
White compliance also leads to detrimental biological effects upon the white race. It leads to miscegenation. And it will lead to increasing physical violence against whites. White compliance could lead to the extinction of the white race.
// The Effects of White Compliance on Non-White and Jewish Societies
In regard to the individuals in non-white and Jewish societies, white compliance presents the promise that relocating to a white society will act to +SA. This is a false promise.
Too, it offers the promise that relocating to a white society will fulfill certain other goals such as giving individuals higher status relative to others of their own respective groups, relative to those in other non-white/Jewish groups, and relative to the human population in general. Compliance implies the possibly of a male-female relationship with a white for sexual fulfillment, to raise status among ones own, to permanently +SA (which cannot be accomplished in this manner, just as it cannot be accomplished in any of the other ways utilized to do so), etc. In addition, compliance by whites holds out the promise of economic gain, as well as the other advantages of white societies - nice surroundings, fairness, compassion, and safety.
In the past, it has been possible that these goals (except permanent +SA) could be met by non-whites and Jews through relocating to a white society. However, as the proportion of non-whites in white societies increases, the likelihood that these goals will be achieved by non-whites newly coming to white societies, or even by non-whites who have been in white societies for a while, or even all their lives, decreases.
Finally, white compliance advances the idea among non-whites and Jews that whites are weak and cowardly. This leads to a predatory response toward whites.
// The Effects of White Non-Compliance on Non-White and Jewish Societies
White non-compliance would involve a preclusion of non-white and Jewish immigration to white societies. This would be known among those in non-white and Jewish societies. So, emigration to a white society would not be a possible option. In this case, non-whites and Jews in non-white and Jewish societies would remain in these societies. This could motivate those who would otherwise move to white societies to improve their own countries, perhaps using white societies as models in the process.
Given white non-compliance, whites would probably not be viewed as weak and cowardly by others. This could preclude or lessen any predatory response toward whites by individual non-whites and Jews or by any given non-white or Jewish society as a whole.
// The Effects of White Non-Compliance on White Societies
White non-compliance would preserve white identities, cultures, and societies.
Were whites non-compliant, large numbers of non-whites could not immigrate to white societies. Thus, the degree of identity that those in a given white society had with other individuals in that society would be relatively high. In view of this, the fondness that the individuals in the society had for one another would be relatively high. Therefore, the happiness of the individuals in the society would be relatively high.
Given that this society would remain mostly white, or all white, the degree of identity that those in the society had for the society as a whole would remain high. Thus, the individuals in the society would have a good degree of fondness for the society as a whole. Consequently, those in the society would have a relatively high degree of happiness.
The above factors would result in a marked degree of social unity.
Since white non-compliance with multiculturalism would keep white societies mostly, or all, white, then the contributions arising from whites' unique combination of emotional make-up and cognitive abilities - including, as before noted, innovations, inventions, philosophies, creations, organizational ideas, etc. - would continue to be encouraged, facilitated, and made. The positive influence that white societies could have worldwide would continue, the likelihood that whites would have a positive effect on the future of the world would remain high, and the likelihood that the extent of this positive effect would be great would remain high.
White societies would retain their finer attributes - orderliness, efficiency, prosperity, fairness, aesthetic quality, safety, etc.
Non-compliance by whites would have a very positive biological effect upon the white race. Miscegenation would be minimized. Too, physical violence against whites by others would be minimized. The white race would be insured a future.
/ Which Way Morality?
As widely noted in this writing, white compliance with the popular beliefs concerning race relations in the current social milieu of the more prosperous white societies is declared to be moral, as well as intelligent, behavior. But is it? The answer to this question is -
\ No.
In fact, white compliance with the views and expectations of the race relations doctrine constitutes irresponsible self-indulgence.
From all that was said previously in this chapter concerning white compliance with the race relations beliefs, it can be seen that the only 'positive' results of this compliance for whites are certain short-term, self-oriented benefits on the part of individuals, including avoiding punishment and, perhaps, gaining certain passing intrinsic rewards such as feeling moral, knowledgeable, etc. and certain tenuous, transitory extrinsic rewards such as social approval. For RE. non-whites and Jews, these 'positive' results would include social behavior that helps to maintain denial and suppression of the underlying facets of race relations and the questionable 'benefits' that this provides, and beliefs and rules that act to regulate social behavior in such a way so as to provide an occasional, temporary, and insubstantial +SA.
Given this and all that was said in this chapter previously, we return to the question -
Which way morality?
The answer is -
\ White compliance with the expectations and demands of multiculturalism is immoral.
White compliance is immoral because it results in detrimental effects, both upon whites and upon non-whites and Jews. It results in detrimental effects upon white societies in the present and, if continued, will lead to catastrophic effects upon white societies in the future. Because of these deleterious effects upon white societies, white compliance results in detrimental effects upon all human civilization in the present and, if continued, will lead to even greater detrimental effects upon all human civilization in the future.
For the most part, this immorality is not intentional. In complying, most whites believe that they are doing the right thing. Intent aside, though, white compliance is immoral.
One further point is that complicity with expectations and activities that could lead to the destruction of one of nature's most remarkable creations - the white race - can hardly be considered moral.
Concerning white non-compliance, it can be said that -
\ White non-compliance with the expectations and demands of multiculturalism is moral.
This does not mean that gratuitous white assailing of others is moral because it is not. What is does mean is that a normal, healthy appreciation on the part of whites for their natural gifts - gifts physical, emotional, and cognitive - and concern for these gifts, and an appreciation and concern for their race, is moral.
White non-compliance is moral in regard to non-whites and Jews - and, indeed, the whole human populace - because the benefits that would exist in a world in which whites were extant and intact would be greater than the benefits that would exist in a world in which whites were not intact or were extinct.
Of course, it must be recognized that as long as whites exist, VWFP will exist. And as long as VWFP exists, IRW, etc. will exist. The operative view in this book, though, is that IRW, etc. can be moderated and that whites and white societies can continue to exist.
/ Comment
The actions taken by RE. non-whites and Jews to +SA and white compliance with the expectations and demands stemming from these efforts to +SA neither do away with the negative feelings in regard to whites, nor insure a future for white societies and the white race. In fact, these activities exacerbate IRW, etc. and, if continued, will lead to the demise of white societies and, possibly, the white race.